Is anyone out there still thinking that this is all really about trade?

 Is anyone out there still thinking that this is all really about trade? 

 

It is worth considering how many Canadians perceive the current trade war as being fundamentally about trade. Increasingly, it appears that public opinion recognizes other underlying factors, such as the United States' expansionist policies and a strategic interest in rare minerals and precious metals. If policymakers were to critically assess these dynamics, it would become apparent that ongoing negotiations with the Trump administration may be unproductive, given that the administration's priorities appear to diverge from traditional trade objectives. 

Trump seeks energy and critical minerals to support his policy goals, including the implementation of tariffs. These tariffs have the potential to significantly impact the Canadian economy and affect American consumers, which could result in economic challenges for both countries and potentially influence global markets. 

If this situation seems familiar, similar errors have occurred repeatedly. This has contributed to a significant increase in the number of people living in poverty globally, beginning with severe conditions in 1929. 

Donald Trump advocates for an isolationist policy, which focuses on centralizing the economy around the United States' interests, including elements of expansionism. Historically, the British Empire in the 1800s exemplified imperial isolationism, relying significantly on its colonies for essential resources to sustain its dominance. However, as Britain relinquished control to what is now referred to as the Commonwealth of Nations, the power and influence of the former British Empire diminished considerably. 

By engaging in ongoing trade discussions of limited effectiveness, the Canadian Government may be hindered from pursuing opportunities with alternative trading partners. This approach could also divert attention from developing domestic Canadian industries, potentially increasing reliance on large multinational corporations to support the national economy. 

The United States' stance is unlikely to shift, as current events—exemplified by Trump—indicate broader trends expected to persist regardless of changes in administration. A review of the country reveals a significant presence of tent cities and individuals experiencing homelessness and displacement, a challenge also observed in Canada. Canada's alignment with American policy has increasingly reflected a lack of independent decision-making. As a result, Canada faces repercussions for its tendency to follow U.S. foreign policy without critical evaluation or autonomous action. 

 

The United States and Canada are considered relatively small market trading nations, collectively representing approximately 400 million people out of a global population exceeding 7 billion. While President Trump has stated that he does not require Canada, it remains apparent that access to resources is subject to debate. As a result, trade discussions hold limited influence; however, sovereignty concerns persist, and there is speculation that any disagreement could potentially lead to forceful measures.